Vina Subbasin 2027 RMS Network Dashboard

Butte County / AGUBC · 31 RMS wells in 26 polygons · Data sources: DWR CKAN Periodic GWL; DTSC EnviroStor monitoring reports (CMW-102A, SWMW-06A); Nov 4, 2026 joint Board packet; Aug 12, 2026 joint Board packet and the draft amended GSP (thresholds) ·
Wells in network
—
2027 GWL RMS
—
Thiessen polygons
—
About this dashboard · README
Loading…

5.2 Interactive Map of the 2027 RMS Network

26 polygons anchored by 31 RMS wells (13 North, 6 Chico — CWSCH01b/02/03/07 and the shallow wells CMW-102A and SWMW-06A, added at the Nov 4, 2026 joint Board meeting — plus 6 supplemental nested completions in Chico shown for hydrograph context, 12 South). The Chico polygon is the dissolved Chico management area — a single fixed boundary regardless of how many RMS wells are assigned to it. Three of the 13 North RMS wells physically sit inside the Chico mgmt area but their Thiessen cells are clipped to N proper (no overlap). Click a polygon to drive the hydrograph in §5.3 and the representativeness comparison in §5.4. Click a well marker for a metadata popup.
2027 Proposed RMS well also a 2022 GSP RMS well Supplemental well Domestic well (LWA, n=1,253) 01-Vina-North polygon 02-Vina-Chico polygon 03-Vina-South polygon Proposed LML polygon

5.3 Polygon Hydrograph & Well Detail

For the selected polygon, this view plots groundwater elevation traces for every well (RMS or supplemental) that falls inside the polygon footprint. Traces show QA-Good readings only — the same convention as the GSA consultant hydrographs and the strawman's SMC method ("excluding questionable measurements"). One flagged exception: at 22N01W05M001M, manual measurements lapsed 2005–2019 while the county operated a continuous recorder there, so a dotted recorder-derived series bridges that gap using each month's highest recorder reading (a static-level proxy; the DWR dataset grades recorder readings questionable as a class). It is display-only and excluded from every statistic on this page. MT / MO / IM-2027 threshold lines are shown for every 2027 RMS well — dashed where the 2022 GSP values carried forward, dotted where values are proposed (Aug 12, 2026 joint Board packet, Attachment B, Alternative 1; draft amended GSP, Table 3-1, at CMW-102A and SWMW-06A). Water levels at CMW-102A and SWMW-06A come from DTSC monitoring reports, which give no DWR grade. The 25 North and South RMS wells additionally get a proposed LML line driven by the slider below.
Toggle wells: Y-axis: Tip: click any column header below to sort.
Dry water year Critical water year (Sacramento Valley Index) MT (Minimum Threshold) MO (Measurable Objective) IM-2027 (Interim Milestone) MT raised (slider) Proposed LML (slider)

Domestic-well sensitivity to MT

Of the 1,253 domestic wells in the LWA inventory, how many sit at an elevation that would make them "dry" if water levels fell to MT — and how that count changes if MT were raised. Toggle elevation correction (above) for the one-sided foothill adjustment. Dry = the well's bottom elevation (AMSL) sits above the threshold; if the basin's water level fell to the threshold, the well would have no water to pump.

Scope MT +5 +10 +15 +20 +25 +30
Subbasin (basin-wide)
Selected polygon

5.4 Representativeness Comparison

Same-month paired groundwater elevations (RMS well on x, comparison well on y) with a 1:1 reference line. Pearson R² and n are shown in the legend when at least 5 paired readings are available.

Built by AGUBC / Tovey Giezentanner · Source workbook: BC Network 2026 v8.xlsx.